I’m a huge fan of forest conservation acts. They have been proven to save the forest, and I’m always happy to see them passed. However, there have been a few things I’ve seen happen that I don’t like. One is the number of actions that seem to be passed that don’t really seem to make a difference. There are some issues with the forest conservation acts that need to be addressed.
What I would like to see is a system that gives people the option to do something about the forest conservation acts. So instead of just having a list of actions, the system could tell the person what they can do, and what they cant do. Like its a list of all the ways that the forest conservation acts arent helping the forest, and if you dont like them you can click on the next one.
Sure, it’s not great, but it could actually do something. I think that there should be some form of a’satisfaction’ button so that a person can choose to either accept or reject the conservation act. The system might even have a limit to how much you can do. For example, lets say you cant make any trees grow back, or you can only reduce the tree cover, and your limit is 5% of whatever the forest management plan says.
I think that there should be a “forest” and “tree” category for all of the conservation acts that we should probably have a “forest conservation act” category for. I think that the forest conservation act should be more restrictive than just saying “no trees on any property” and just saying “we don’t care about the trees.
What I mean is that most of the conservation acts are just regulations in the sense that you have to do something in order for them to be enacted. For example, there are some regulations that say you must build a road or trail, or build a bridge, or build a dam, or build a power line, or build a water treatment facility, or build some sort of building or road. There are not many conservation acts that don’t require something to be done.
There are not that many conservation acts, so the ones that do exist are fairly minor. For example, there are some that require that you pay a certain fee or do something at an official place. There are also some that require you to use some sort of environmental action or money. Like the Clean Water Act, which requires that you reduce the amount of pollution in your water. There are also some that require you to purchase certain products or do something for your environment.
In general, conservation acts don’t have a long history and are not necessarily very popular. As a result, they are usually not much of an issue in the average American’s life.
The biggest problem with conservation is that you can’t just put up a fence and keep the lawn that’s protecting you from the sun. That’s not to say that conservation doesn’t have a lot of value, but it definitely does. It doesn’t have to be on the property itself, it’s just a matter of time until the lawn becomes a place for wildlife to take residence and the sky becomes the front yard.
I just looked over this list of conservation act. I dont think there is anything new under the sun, so I feel like there has to be something that I missed. I love the idea of putting up a fence to keep the wildlife out, but I think theres a better idea to place it in the middle of the road. That way those little critters don’t have an easy escape route.
I think you could get away with putting up a fence in the middle of the road and then put up a fence in the middle of the lawn. If the squirrels could get to the fence, they would probably just climb through it and then head for the road.